The participants were only able to agree on the timing of the next NPT conference. The Russian side believes that it was not possible to agree on the document due to “politicized and false” statements by some delegations on Ukraine< source srcset="https://s0.rbk.ru/v6_top_pics/resized/320xH/media/img/4/52/756615622569524.jpg 320w" media="(max-width: 320px)" >
< img class="aligncenter" src="https://s0.rbk.ru/v6_top_pics/media/img/4/52/756615622569524.jpg" alt="Participants of the Nuclear Weapons Conference did not agree on the final document" />
At the review conference of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), it was not possible to agree on the final document, the chairman of the conference, Gustavo Zlauvinen, announced.
According to him, the participants did not reach consensus on the content of the document, but agreed only on the procedural part, which sets dates for the next conference in 2026.
Igor Vishnevetsky, Deputy Director of the Department for Non-Proliferation and Arms Control of the Russian Foreign Ministry, said that many delegations had objections to the text of the document, while the Russian— the most key. They refer to items “that are overtly political in nature.” “We made our last attempt, proposed to modify these points,” — he said (quoted by TASS), adding that the request of the Russian side was not granted.
Andrei Belousov, Deputy Permanent Representative of Russia to the UN Office in Geneva, said that it was not possible to reach a consensus, among other things, because of the weak desire of states with the opposite point of view to take into account the opinion of opponents and “politicized, biased, groundless and deceitful” people. statements by some delegations on Ukraine, where Russia is conducting a military operation. However, the diplomat noted, he does not consider the lack of a final document a failure of the conference.
The 10th NPT Review Conference was held on August 1 in New York, one of the topics of discussion was the situation at the Zaporozhye nuclear power plant. Since the outbreak of hostilities in Ukraine, it has been under Russian control; the parties accuse each other of shelling the territory of the nuclear power plant.
The NPT entered into force on March 5, 1970, it has 191 member states. Non-nuclear-weapon states have pledged not to manufacture or acquire them. Countries that have nuclear weapons have pledged not to help or encourage other states to produce or acquire them.
Read on RBC Pro Pro Is it possible to speed up metabolism to lose weight Articles Pro x The Economist Forced stop: what slows down the electric car market – The Economist us in your pocket”: what are six signs that a fraudulent lawyer will give out Instructions Pro Transferring money to a Western partner: how to ensure that they are not blocked life is 99.5% work: the founder of Revolut on priorities Articles
The final documents of the conference confirmed the extension of the contract for the next five years, but in 1995 the agreement was extended indefinitely. Currently, the final document is not legally binding. At the previous conference, which was held in 2015, it was also not possible to agree on it.
Authors Tags Should I sell assets at a discount now?
Understanding the newsletter